I come from a beer-drinking country. Well, we’re not as mono-cultural as
we once were, thank God. When I was a kid, New Zealand culture could be pretty
much summed up by the three words: Rugby, Racing, and Beer. There was an institution
known as ‘The 6 O’clock Swill’. This phenomenon owed its existence to the fact
that pubs in NZ used to close their doors at 6 pm, or shortly thereafter. Those
who had built up a thirst during their working day (mostly men at that period
of our history) had one hour to get to the nearest watering hole and quaff as
much ale as they could before the law of the land decreed that they should get
out and head home to their loving wives and/or families. As you may imagine,
this was not conducive to the development of civilised drinking habits – and
the effects are still felt, a generation or two on.
A selection of Turkish wines |
Of course, other alcoholic beverages were available. The more
sophisticated or perhaps feminine might sip sherry, or something
euphemistically labelled ‘Pimms’. Continental tastes were provided for by
immigrants from Eastern Europe, who produced something distantly akin to red
wine, commonly referred to as ‘Dally Plonk’. Unshaven gentlemen of no fixed
abode were sometimes to be seen on park benches sampling this brew from bottles
concealed in plain brown paper bags.
I’m happy to say, we are a more civilised nation these days. A
referendum in 1967 extended bar hours to 10 pm – allowing for less frenetic
speed drinking. Somewhere around the late 1970s, a wine culture started to gain
a foothold. Citizens began to discover the surprising fact that moderate
consumption of alcohol could accompany a meal and intelligent conversation. The
drinks themselves could become a topic for discussion: “Well, I’d say this full-bodied red shows dark rich berry, chocolate and
spice characters enhanced by subtle toasty oak nuances, what would you say
darling?” “Oh do shut up, Charles, and pass the bottle, won’t you?”
These days, teachers and civil servants nearing retirement age aspire to
establishing a boutique winery in Hawkes Bay or Marlborough, or some other
location where the micro-climate is conducive and the real estate prices more
affordable. New Zealand wines have a well-earned reputation abroad, winning
medals at international events, and wine exports are a nice little earner for
our humble economy. New Zealanders of a certain class pride themselves, not
only on knowing the difference between a Chardonnay and a Sauvignon Blanc, but
also on what vintages of which particular vineyards produced the best ones.
What I want to say here is, though, this didn’t happen over night. An
increasingly wealthy society and an expanding middle class availed themselves of
greater opportunities to travel abroad and see for themselves the older
oenophile cultures of Europe. Organisations of wine producers brought together
like-minded entrepreneurs who exerted persuasive pressure on governments to
create a favourable climate for growth, and on the media to help in educating the populace and building a potential market. Another factor has undoubtedly been a
hard-line approach by authorities to drivers who drink, such that it is a brave
soul who gets behind the steering wheel after even one beer or glass of wine.
Two generations, then, have seen radical changes in drinking patterns of
New Zealanders (and our Australian cousins, though I have to confess, they were
always a little ahead of us). These days, executives and other high-flyers
watch rugby matches while sipping quality wines in corporate boxes with their
spouses or paramours. Of course, remnants of the old ways live on in footie
clubs and suburban beer barns - but as a nation, we have diversified in many
fields, and alcohol consumption is one measure of this.
So, what about Turkey, you're asking. Weren't you going to say something
about that? And so I am. The land occupied by the modern Republic of Turkey is
one of the birthplaces of human civilisation. Asia Minor and the plains between
the two rivers, whose waters rise in south-eastern Turkey, witnessed the first
domestication of animals and the growing of crops for food, the moulding and
firing of clay to make pots, and the early stages of metallurgy. Hand in hand
with the march of civilisation went the production and consumption of alcoholic
beverages. It seems likely that the first wild grapes were cultivated here, and
the first hesitant steps taken on the road to producing an award-winning pinot
noir. The classical civilisations of Greece and Rome enjoyed their wine. They
even assigned responsibility for it to a junior member of their divine pantheon
– the Romans, Bacchus, and the Greeks, Dionysus. After the Imperial authorities
gave up massacring and otherwise persecuting Christians, and Romans and Greeks
joined the ranks of the Saved, apparently they didn't let their new faith stand
in the way of imbibing an amphora or two of Bacchus's nectar.
Grape cultivation and wine production in Asia Minor continued in good
heart until the Muslim Ottomans took over. The Prophet Muhammed was, I understand, quite
specific in his proscription of wine for true believers. Why didn't he mention
beer, cider, Pimms and other
spirituous liquors (if, in fact, he didn't. My Arabic is not up to checking the
original text to see what his exact words were)? Well, one reason very likely
is that, in the evolution of alcoholic beverages, distillation arrived
relatively late on the scene. Scotch whisky may now be regarded as a
traditional tipple North o' the Border, but most of the great whisky houses in
fact date from the 19th century, as by the way, do most of the clan tartans.
Anyway, the Prophet's lack of omniscience on this one left an alcoholic
loophole for Turks to slip through. For some at least, obeying the letter of Koranic
law and abstaining from wine is enough - and the considerably more powerful
rakı, with an alcohol content of 45%, is readily accepted.
It also helped that the Ottomans adopted a tolerant approach to
religious minorities within their borders. Jews, Orthodox Greeks and Armenians
were not only permitted to observe their religious customs, speak their own
languages and educate their children relatively unmolested, they were also
allowed to grow their grapes, trample the vintage, ferment, bottle, sell and
imbibe the fruit of the vine pretty much according to established practice.
More than a few Sultans, most of whom anyway were born to Christian mothers,
are reputed to have liked a drop from time to time - and no doubt some of their
Muslim subjects saw little harm, occasionally, in joining their
Brothers-of-the-Book in a glass or two for friendship's sake.
Nevertheless, it must be true that, for a considerable period, at a time
when European civilization was making great strides towards modern alcoholic
sophistication (and in other fields too for all I know), wine production within
the Ottoman domains failed to keep pace with developments in France, Italy,
Germany and so on. When the Ottoman Empire breathed its last and the Turkish
Republic came into existence in 1923, its first president, among a host of
better known reforms, freed up the production and consumption of spirituous and
fermented liquors. While tobacco and spirits were under state monopoly, wine,
probably in deference to the status quo, was left in the hands of private
producers - though the state did also establish its own vineyards and wineries.
Tezcan Gürkan, owner of Ganos
wineries in Mürefte, began his career with the state Tekel organisation. His vines produce a range of boutique wines, red
and white, under the Krater, and the
more up-market Ganos label. Tezcan
Bey has mixed feelings about the current state of the wine industry in Turkey.
He is passionate about its long history, and its potential to compete in world
markets, owing to the country's congenial climate and fertile soils. In terms of human health, he points out, the benefits of moderate wine
consumption, especially red wine, in reducing the risk of heart attack,
diabetes and even some forms of cancer, have been well publicized. Tezcan Bey
further notes that, in the past ten years, during the tenure of the present AK
Party government, locally produced wines have improved markedly, both in
variety and quality. He is enthusiastic about wines produced from local grape
varieties such as boğazkere, öküzgözü and kalecik karası. While accepting that Turkey's climate is more
conducive to the production of red wines, he also mentions the potential of narince and other white varieties in
certain microclimates. On the other hand, he is less sanguine about the future,
given the punitive level of taxation targeting alcohol in Turkey. I can attest
to this from my own experience, having seen the cost of a mid-price red wine at
the supermarket checkout almost double in the past five years.
Still, it's not government policy alone that is impeding the industry's
growth. That same bottle of Angora or
Villa Doluca, selling for 20 Turkish
liras at Migros, will probably add sixty to eighty liras to your bill at a restaurant. The Ministry of Tourism would do well
to take a look at the effects of such pricing on visitors to the country. It
may be that Turks themselves, weighing up relative value for money, will go for
a bottle of rakı with four times the alcohol content - but foreign visitors are
more likely to drink one bottle of wine instead of two, and feel scalped into
the bargain.
Nevertheless, the younger Gürkan generation seems more optimistic.
Tezcan Bey's son, Doruk, recognizes the potential of a growing, and
increasingly sophisticated middle class in Turkish cities. One measure of this
is the regular appearance these days, of articles in Turkish newspapers and
magazines discussing wine, local and imported, and the industry itself. As was
the case in my own home country, the twin processes of increasing awareness,
and growing demand feed off each other.
Still it is evident that the Turkish wine industry is nowhere near to
achieving its potential as an export earner for the nation. A recent article in
Hürriyet newspaper examined and
compared the state of play in a number of comparable countries, in terms of
grape vine acreage and wine production. According to their figures, Turkey has the
fourth largest area of vines measured by hectares. Only Spain, France and Italy have more
grapes under cultivation. In contrast, however, Turkey's comparative wine
production is minuscule, at 75 million litres, ranking it way below even New
Zealand, with a fraction of the vine acreage. NZ's wine exports, incidentally,
generated 868 million dollars of income, and clearly Turkey has the potential
to surpass that.
The big problem, as I see it, and Gürkan 'pere et fils' among others, apparently
agree, is the lack of a large and knowledgeable local market. Whatever the
sector, economies of scale determine whether an enterprise will succeed or
fail. New Zealand has been able to develop its wine exports because locals
drank enough of the stuff to get the business up and running. Turkey, with a
population approaching eighty million, had a large enough local market to
support the establishment of car manufacturing, electronics and whiteware
factories, and a large textile industry - which have then been able to move out
into more competitive global markets. New Zealand, unfortunately, with its
four-and-a-half million people, lacks this major advantage. Clearly what
Turkish wine producers need and seem to lack, is an umbrella organisation that
will speak for them, arguing the case for government support of the industry,
and engaging in general campaigns to raise public awareness.
As one who enjoys a glass of wine, and appreciates the local product,
I'm following developments in the sector with interest.
Dear Alan,
ReplyDeleteIt is a very nice article. The picture is also great. You could have given a bit more statistics about consumption and production of Turkey according to years. Thanks.
well written
ReplyDeleteThanks for the feedback, Doruk. I appreciate the contribution you and your father made!
Delete